Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Twitter: 18 days later...

"For the last couple of months, I've been bashing Twitter and saying why it was absolutely ridiculous and pointless. And then I actually went to the Twitter website. Obviously, that visit to their homepage changed my perspective on Twitter, so much so that I am the proud owner of a Twitter myself."
-- Me; April 21, 2009

When I wrote that, I had been using Twitter for three days, and I thought that it was the best thing since sliced bread. But that was still during the honeymoon period.

Now, I've had it for two and a half weeks, and in that time, I've really started to get a feel for the complete Twitter experience. The good, the bad, and the ugly.

The thing that I love about Twitter is the ability to stay connected with everyone, and to stay updated on what everybody's up to. I've even gotten a few of my friends hooked on Twitter; they weren't crazy about it at first, but now they're just as hooked as I am. As I've spent more time on Twitter, however, I've found that I now, unfortunately, have an addiction to Tweeting.

Yep. My name is David Hudson, and I'm a Twitterholic.

Over the last couple of weeks, I've Tweeted about everything from waiting forever at the DMV, to having a great brunch at IHOP, and to being appalled and disgusted at sportscaster Craig Sager's wardrobe choice. (Really, any guy that would wear a jacket like this should disgust anybody with any good fashion taste whatsoever. I respect him for not being afraid to oppose society's standards of fashion, but still. That's just not necessary. Neither is this.)

I've also Tweeted sometimes, not even because of a change in what I was doing, but simply because I felt the urge to Tweet. As a result, I would Tweet about trivial things... such as my strong disdain for Craig Sager's apparel.

But wait... is this what Twitter was created for? I highly doubt it. Twitter asks its users one simple question: "What are you doing?" The purpose of the site would then seem to be to keep people updated on what others are doing. In fact, the site itself explains Twitter's origins:

"Where did the idea for Twitter come from? Jack Dorsey had grown interested in the simple idea of what his friends were doing. Specifically, Jack wondered if there might be an opportunity to build something compelling around this status concept."

Did Dorsey then expect Twitter to become what it has today? A web of not only status updates, but people's thoughts and opinions on things such as sportscaster's wardrobes? He probably didn't. But that doesn't necessarily make Twitter bad.

Except for one thing. People don't often change what they're doing every second of the day, but people do have thoughts and opinions all day long. For example, a person who goes to work from 9 to 5 will most likely stay in the workplace for that whole time (except for maybe a lunch break). While this person is in the workplace, however, the thoughts that will go through his/her brain are innumerable. Therefore, the updates that this person could post to Twitter are also innumerable, as Tweets are no longer just status updates, but random thoughts, opinions, feelings, etc., that one may have.

Because of the innumerable amount of Tweets that one could post, one might feel the need to Tweet, and Tweet, and Tweet, to the point where Tweeting becomes a status itself. (The other day, I saw someone Tweet that they were "planning their next Twitter update." Ugh.)

Twitter might as well take a page out of Facebook's book (sorry for the redundancy). Instead of asking "What are you doing?", Facebook asks its users, "What's on your mind?" And that's basically the same question that Twitter users are answering, whether or not the question is worded the same way. Twitter should probably go ahead and fix that question.

Nevertheless, people (myself included) often like to feel important. We like to feel that other people care about what we're doing, what we're thinking, and what we're feeling. And Twitter shows that other people actually do care... but not that much. They don't need to know everything that we're thinking about.

For example, one of the people I decided to follow on Twitter was Ludacris, mainly because I'm a huge fan of his music, and I love the lyrical style he employs in his raps. In a recent span of 24 hours, however, he Tweeted 31 times. Is that really necessary?

No. No matter how famous you are, you're not that important. At least not to me.

So, people, just chill out with the Tweets. Keep some of your thoughts to yourself. They might be funny, humorous, deeply philosophical... whatever. But when you're filling up my entire Twitter homepage because you just can't stop Tweeting, that's not a good look. Just keep it simple and let me know what you're doing. That is why everybody signed up for this thing, right?

P.S. Seriously, though... somebody needs to get Craig Sager a gift certificate to either Men's Wearhouse or LensCrafters, so he can buy either a nice, fashionable, classy suit, or at least some glasses to help him see how awful and atrocious his current wardrobe really is. That mess is ridiculous.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Is this the season?

Last night, I was watching Game 7 of the Bulls/Celtics series (which the Celtics won... ugh...), and I saw something in the Bulls that reminded me of my Lakers:

A lack of a consistent killer instinct.

Back in the days when Kobe and Shaq played beautifully together, the Lakers would pull together to do whatever it took to finish off an opponent (e.g. Game 7 vs. the Blazers in the 2000 Western Conference Finals). We knew we needed to win, and we wouldn't stop until we did exactly that... win.

That was then, this is now.

Over the last few seasons, the Lakers have continued to be a very talented team, but we've just been missing that extra... that extra "umph." I realized that when we lost to the Suns back in the first round of the 2006 playoffs. And my realization was later emphasized last season with our Game 6 loss to the Celtics in the Finals.

So how do we overcome this? (Note: when I say "we," I mean the Lakers. Just to clarify.) To be honest, I have no idea. As good, and as skilled, and as talented as Kobe is... and as clutch as he can be, I still don't see that consistent killer instinct, night in and night out, like I saw in the past with MJ, the "Bad Boys" of Detroit, or even now with LeBron for that matter.

Okay, so I just attributed a quality to King James that Kobe doesn't have. Sorry. But if anyone remembers the Cavaliers' Game 5 win over the Pistons two years ago, you understand where I'm coming from.

Let me clarify something else right quick, though. I started out discussing the Lakers' lack of killer instinct, and then I ended up talking about Kobe's lack of killer instinct. Why? Because a team gets its strength from the head. For example, if the coach doesn't know what they're doing, then, no matter how much talent the team has, they won't know what they're doing either.

I know, I know. Kobe isn't the coach. But he's assumed a clear leadership role on the team, and, as a result, the team looks to him for direction. Therefore, to put it plainly, if he doesn't go hard, then the team won't go hard.

But anyway, I don't expect the Lakers to make this killer instinct clear every single night. The fact of the matter is, we're still one of the best teams, if not the best team, in the NBA. Some nights, we just won't have to go as hard as other nights.

However, in those big games where we need to go hard... well, we need to go hard. Talent doesn't win games on its own. Bummer.

So will this be the season that the championship returns to Los Angeles? It depends. If we want the championship badly enough, we'll get it. But that's all it depends on.

Do we have the ability to win it? Yes.

Do we want to win it? I would think so.

Do we want to win it more than the Cavaliers, the Celtics, or any other team still in the playoffs? That's the question... and I really don't know.

Is this the season that we actually will win it? We'll see.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Hmm... is technology really a good thing?

So I have a final exam tomorrow afternoon, along with a 5-page paper that's also due tomorrow.

But about 3 hours ago, I found myself updating both my Facebook and both Twitter. Which leads me to ask the question:

Is technology really a good thing?

Of course it is. I seriously just need to learn how to focus on my work.

The question I asked, however, is the same question that many other people ask all the time, as a lot of the technological advances over the past few years seem to become distractions, getting in the way of other work that needs to be done. With MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc., there are numerous alternatives to doing work.

But why does it seem that people are more distracted with modern technology than they were in the past? The most likely reason is the interactivity that makes this new technology popular. All of the aforementioned web sites are examples of what has been termed "Web 2.0," described by Tim O'Reilly, founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media, as transforming the Internet into "a more mature, distinctive medium characterized by user participation, openness, and network effects" (Web 2.0: Principles and Best Practices, O'Reilly Radar).

"User participation"... that means users have to participate, right? And the more that users participate, the more popular the technology becomes. And the more popular the technology becomes, the more that users participate. It's a never-ending cycle that will continue to both attract and distract more and more people.

So how do we get past the "distraction" of this new technology? It's not easy, that's for sure.

But let's think about something: when televisions became popular in American society during the 50's and 60's, people saw TV as very distracting, as it "invaded" their households at a ridiculously fast pace, providing news and entertainment throughout the day.

Did this mean that TV was bad, though? Of course not. Think about this: when you wake up in the morning and want to know what you should wear, you don't have to step outside. Instead, you can just turn on your TV, flip to The Weather Channel, and get an update on the current temperature, along with information about the weather for the entire week. (You can even watch shows about crazy storms and hurricanes and such, but that's not as crucial.)

The point I'm trying to make is that, although new technology might be seen as a distraction, it helps make life more convenient and efficient in the long run. And it helps make it more fun, too. (My new iPod Touch is a great example of this... especially the fun part.)

Okay. I'm done writing. Let me go start my paper. I just need to update my Facebook and my Twitter first to let everyone know that I'm finally writing it.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Beyoncé messed that girl up!

***POSSIBLE SPOILERS BELOW***

I'ma keep this post very short and simple: if you haven't seen the new movie "Obsessed," you should.

Not because of its intricate storyline... because, well, it's not that intricate. It's actually very predictable.

Not because of its exciting script... because, well, it's very tedious to watch, and it gets very repetitive at some points.

Honestly, there's nothing that makes this movie stand out over any other movies. You know exactly what to expect from the movie after watching about the first 5 minutes of it.

So what is it that makes this movie appealing? Two things:
  • #1: The actors are so into their roles that the ferocity with which they act is just amazing to watch (the on-screen chemistry between Beyoncé and her husband, played by Idris Elba, is absolutely brilliant).
  • #2: The whole movie is basically preparation for one of the greatest ending fight scenes in cinematic history. (Obviously, I'm biased because it's Beyoncé, but when she goes at it with the girl who's trying to steal her husband... absolutely beautiful.)
But for real, good movie. Check it out... you'll be obsessed with it.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Nappy Thursday...

Yeah... "Nappy Thursday..." I know you're wondering why I gave this post that name. Well, two main reasons:
  • #1: On a day that I really need to be extremely productive academically, I can't seem to stay mentally functional for more than 3 hours at a time. And I've been taking nappies all day long. I don't really know why. Probably because all these long nights I've been spending in the library are starting to catch up with me. Oh well, it's still just the beginning... it's gonna be a long couple of weeks...
  • #2: I didn't get a haircut yesterday as I had planned... so I'm still NAPPY!!! That's all.
But back to reason #1. I have a 5-page paper due Monday, another 5-page paper due Tuesday, a 12-page paper also due Tuesday, and yet another 5-page paper due next Saturday. On top of that, I have my first final exam next Thursday, followed by another one next Friday, another one next Saturday, and yet another one due sometime before May 8...

Hooray college! Anyway, I'm gonna take a very quick nap since my TA hasn't shown up to my discussion section yet, which was supposed to start 6 minutes ago. I'll be back...

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Ah, the joys of college...

I'm sitting in the library... late at night... again... working on a paper... and I'm not really that happy about being here.

So, I decided to make a list of reasons why I should be happy right now:
  • #1: The Lakers took a 2-0 lead in their first-round series vs. the Jazz. Gotta love that PURPLE & GOLD!!!
  • #2: I ate eel for the first time today. Absolutely delicious.
  • #3: I had a really good workout earlier... getting me that much closer to having that six-pack for the summer!
  • #4: I just devoured one of those new Reese's SnackBarz and washed it down with strawberry kiwi juice. (#4 probably isn't very good following #3, but oh well...)
  • #5: Although I have work to do, I don't have anything that's due tomorrow, so I can finally get some sleep tonight/this morning... I miss my bed...
  • #6: I'm finally getting a haircut sometime tomorrow. Praise His Holy Name!
  • #7: I'm spending the night working in the library with a great friend of mine by the name of Erica... good times :)
Ahhh... there. That made me feel better. Now back to work...

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Twitter, anyone?

Three days ago, the unthinkable happened.

I got a Twitter.

Yep... you read that right. I signed up for my very own Twitter.

So why is that unthinkable? For the last couple of months, I've been bashing Twitter and saying why it was absolutely ridiculous and pointless. And then I actually went to the Twitter website. Obviously, that visit to their homepage changed my perspective on Twitter, so much so that I am the proud owner of a Twitter myself.

So why exactly did I get a Twitter? Because it helps keep me connected. And anybody that knows me knows that I like to stay connected. Now, Twitter doesn't have all the added features of Facebook. It doesn't have all of the pictures you've taken, the videos you've recorded, or the random applications you've added to your page to make it look more "fly." And it doesn't have the collegiate feel of Facebook either... even though that last part is going away very quickly; it's scaring me how many Facebook friends I have over the age of 40.

But that's exactly what makes Twitter great. As much as I love Facebook, it gets way too unnecessarily cluttered at times. Sure, I'd love to hear about your amazing summer vacation in the Bahamas, but do I really need to see a whole photo album from your trip on my homepage? I think not.

Well, maybe I want to see the 5 billion quizzes you've taken on Facebook about your personality, what your name means, what your birth month means, what your... wait... I really don't care about that either.

What do I care about then? The same thing that Twitter does. All I do is tell Twitter what I'm up to, in 140 characters or less, and everybody following my Twitter will know what I'm up to as well.

Let me just put it this way: KISS... "Keep It Simple, Stupid."

Intrusive? Maybe.

Nosy? Probably.

Fun (to me)? Definitely.

Now not everybody's going to like Twitter. There will still be those that view this as an unnecessary invasion of privacy that allows everyone to see what you're doing at all times. And that's exactly why those people don't have to sign up for it.

For the rest of us, it's a very clean, effortless, and useful tool to keep abreast of what's going on with your favorite people. For example, when I was embarking on an all-nighter in the library yesterday, my dad, who wants to stay up-to-date on my academic happenings, got an update as soon as I changed my Twitter status. He sent me a message later that night, telling me not to work too hard... and that he had just enjoyed a "thrilling episode of 24." Thanks, Dad... not only did I miss out on sleep, but I missed my favorite show on television. Great.

(Just kidding Dad... you know I appreciate the advice.)

That's why I like Twitter, though. From either my computer or my phone, I can update anybody that wants to know what I'm up to.

And that's all.

Twitter keeps it simple. So don't be stupid. Get a Twitter, and Tweet away. You'll be glad you did.